Affirmative Action is Being Challenged.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/world/asia/indias-rich-benefit-from-schools-affirmative-action.html Now here is a topic which might set off heated controversy. What happens when people of darker "varna" (colour) actually prosper over those who are lighter complected? I myself feel that it's a shame that there aren't enough places both educationally, and vocationally, for all meritous persons to have opportunity. And I can also see how a priveledged class might develope amongst those peoples who benefit from affirmative action, in the higher education. Like for instance, let's say that a lower caste student marries another student, whether or not the other student is of the same caste. Their children would be doubly favoured, in regards to admission to that colledge, both as a lower caste, and as a child of an alumnus. Where as higher caste, yet lower class, persons might have a harder time being accepted. Personally I feel that affirmative action was possibly developed in order to try to prevent the various peoples from joining together, on order to do away with the verry system which pits different races against each other, in a competitive rivalry. I feel that capitalism thrives on competition, not only between companies, but between castes. It favours aristocracy over meritocracy. And so therefore, in my opinion, is incompatible with democracy.

Young Anarchists Go To Trial Due to Possession of Books.

http://thesoundandnoise.com/2012/09/14/young-persons-called-to-private-grand-jury-for-owning-books/ I'd read of this issue, and addressed it, on my blog. http://libertariansocialist.blogspot.com/2012/08/police-go-on-fishing-expedition-based.html I think that it's a horrid shame that this has gone to trial. I also think that the federal government should specify whom the enemy is. During the Civil War, in which President Lincoln assumed emergency powers, such as suspension of habeas corpus, it was only applied against those deemed to be Confederates. Not abolitionists, of whom a number took part in John Brown's raid, and were in violation of the Fugative Slave Act, which was still in effect, at the time, and not even socialists, whether they be Marxian, or Fourierist. Anarchists have been a presence in American thought, from earliest times. Including men such as Josiah Warren http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josiah_Warren , Lysander Spooner http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysander_Spooner , and women such as Voltairine de Cleyre http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltairine_de_Cleyre. After hearing of this, I will never let any police into my personal place of residence, not without a warrant anyway. I have "Understanding Power", by Noam Chomsky, and "The Radical Reader". I wonder if perhaps that deputy sheriff who came straight to my property, after someone reported hearing automatic gunfire, might have been hoping to have been permitted to look into my trailer, under the pretext of looking for weapons. Growing up, as an evangelical Christian, I was brought up to prepare myself for the event that a tyranical regime might come looking for Bibles, if the practice of the Christian religion were to become prohibited. But now that I've become a libertarian socialist, I might have to fear them coming after me due to my anarchist literature, and views. I never seriously imagined that the American authorities would ever abuse their power like this though. Not this blatantly, and not in my lifetime anyway.

The Familiy Research Council's Bitterness is Ironic

You might have heard of the attempted fire arm attack upon the offices of the Family Research Council. http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/16/us/dc-shooting/index.html While I personally feel that it is unethical to initiate violent force, in any conflict, I also sincerely believe that one should only be blamed for the actions one does, not the opinions one holds. The Southern Poverty Law Center, is now being faulted by the head of the FRC, for daring to call them out on their defamation, if not outright intimidation, of such people as gays, and lesbians. Here is a statement, by the SPLC, in response to these allegations. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/news/splc-family-research-council-license-to-kill-claim-outrageous Also, not only does the SPLC not condone violence, it is selective in whom it deems to be a hate group. An organization has to be more than just critical of others;it must also be hostile, and/or wantonly hateful. Just merely being a conservative religious group, with traditionalist values, will not qualify them as being a hate group, based upon SPLC criteria. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/news/splc-s-anti-gay-hate-list-compiled-with-diligence-and-clear-standards I just want to end by making these points. If an attack were commited against a pro-gay group, Lambda for instance, and officials from this group were to blame the Family Research Council for provoking it, I imagine that the same man whom now is trying to lambast the SPLC for their stand, would spread alarm about the possibility of public repression of free expression. Look, it should be apparant that despotic, demagogic, theonomic, entities do not value personal freedom, and tolerance. They just simply try to prey upon the sentiments of naive indivisuals who do.

In London Police SEarched For, And Seized, Anti-Olympic Materials

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/21/olympics2012-civil-liberties

 But this goes against both the 1st, and 4th, amendments of the Constitution! Oh yeah, that's right, the Constitution does not apply in the U.K. Thanks for reminding me of why America broke away. Though, as I posted before, http://

www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/fbi-raid-anarchist-literature-portland-seattle/6267/#more-6267 , the police have been doing similar in certain areas of the country, here in U.S.A. The supposed land of the free, and home of the brave. Yeah right! More like land of rising fascism, and home of the slave. Which is why, along side demonstrations, and non-violent direct actions, I support voting for Jill Stein. As does the Socialist Alternative http://www.socialistalternative.org/news/article10.php?id=1885, which is an affiliate of the Committee for a Worker's International. Though the CWI is not really a specificly libertarian socialist organization. in fact, for what it's worth, they're Trotskyist. But my one friend is a member, and he seems cool anyway.

Police Go On Fishing Expedition, Based Upon Political Prejudices

http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/fbi-raid-anarchist-literature-portland-seattle/6267/#more-6267

 Now this is completely invalid. What they're investigating would constitute a "thought crime". And also, some of the items searched for, and seized, are not intrinsticly political. Black clothing, seriously? So what, they're going after goths now? Citizens of this supposedly free country should feel safe to pursue ideas, and express their opinions, without fearing repression from the police forces. Persons should only be investigated, and subsequently incarcerated, upon reasonable indication of terrorist, and/or otherwise criminal activity. In other words, for what one does, not how one feels. If these authorities are genuinely concerned about anti-government sentiment, such abuses of political power will only heighten it. I think that even those who are not in any way anarchistic still might have reason to be concerned about this. I mean, what if the state starts to turn it's attention to other people who they might possibly find to be potentionally dangerous. For instance political groups that are old right, as well as those that are left.. Are perhaps the powers that be might come looking for religious literature even, such as Qurans, or even Bibles. Such guilt be association, directed at undefined enemies, endangers all persons who have strong dissent about any issue, regardless of ideology. As Pastor Martin Niemöller once said, "First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a communist;

Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist;

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a trade unionist;

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew;

Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak out for me."

My Online Clash With a Black Hebrew Israelite

This week I got into an exchange with someone whom turned out to be a "Black Hebrew", on a facebook post my one friend started. For those whom might not know, they are like the inverse of Christian Identity, and/or British-Israelism. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2008/fall/ready-for-war/history-of-hebrew-israeli Here is the thread, with names removed to protect privacy.

"cant believe how many ignornant/stupid people I know personally! So what, if I want to date/talk to a muslim! You are showing your stupidity again.

 and his momma is a baptist, so get over yourself!Saturday at 5:58pm · LikeUnlike · 2 I agree Andrea...Ignorance is NOT bliss! It's a cancer.Saturday at 6:06pm · LikeUnlike · 1. You're dating a Muslim? Interestingly, from what I've heard, and read, Muslim men may wed outside their religion, as long as the woman is either Christian, or Jewish, and agrees to allow any children resulting to be raised as Muslims. Also your friends might be concerned because they might have read, and/or seen films such as "Not Without My Daughter". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Without_My_Daughter Under shariah law, Muslim husbands may impose corporal punishment, as a last resort, before divorce, just like in regards to children. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/uae-official-tries-explain-court-ruling-upholding-muslim-men-s-right-beat-their-wives I trust though that you won't allow any man to mistreat you, regardless of faith tradition. By the way, I don't believe that Muslims are even allowed to date, so to speak. http://islam.about.com/od/marriage/a/courtship.htm So he might just be a cultural Muslim anyway. And once again, I'm not trying to put him down, just saying to make sure that you know what to expect, and what will be expected of you in return, going into the relationship.Saturday at 6:12pm · LikeUnlike. he has no kids,just a dog and I am done having anymore so that topic has been put to rest.Saturday at 6:45pm · LikeUnlike. And no jason they never saw the 20 yr sally field flick,,.. They have been brainwashed by christains since sept. 11thSaturday at 6:51pm · LikeUnlike.LOLSaturday at 7:14pm · LikeUnlike · 1. are his other wives OK with this?,....wait a sec, Mormon or Muslim? Oh yeah, same diff,( as far as number of wives is concerned )Saturday at 7:27pm · LikeUnlike · 1. and I'm TOTALLY down with it,.....must get kind of expensive though.Saturday at 7:29pm · LikeUnlike · 1. Oh, ok. And in case anyone might get the wrong idea, I'm not meaning to personally lump anyone together. But I do reserve the right to voice my concerns, and make whatever criticisms i deem appropiate, under the Soviet constitution, which states this. "Article 52. Citizens of the USSR are guaranteed freedom of conscience, that is, the right to profess or not to profess any religion, and to conduct religious worship or atheistic propaganda. Incitement of hostility or hatred on religious grounds is prohibited.



In the USSR, the church is separated from the state, and the school from the church. " http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/77cons02.html#chap07 So at any rate, hope it works out ok, Andrea. :)Saturday at 7:32pm · LikeUnlike. funny MCrow!Saturday at 7:33pm · LikeUnlike.Michael Crow lookinSaturday at 7:33pm · LikeUnlike.Fyi, Michael , Muslims are limited to no more than four wives. And they do have to be able to financially support them. So only the more wealthy of them, actually are polygamists.Saturday at 7:34pm · LikeUnlike · 1. You guys are great!Saturday at 7:38pm · UnlikeLike · 2. is an atheist......but I lean old testament,( when it comes to the acquisition of women )Saturday at 7:41pm · LikeUnlike · 1. Yikes! I sure do hope you're joking,  In the Old Testament men were at times authorised to acquire women by force. One such example would be Numbers 31. This woman, who's a Revolutionary Communist party member makes mention of this, in this talk. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRG_yAbOB38 So yeah, no personal offense intended, but I feel that if some of the stuff in the bible were instead found in the Quran, we'd never hear the end of it from such persons as conservative commentators, about how supposedly evil it is. And understandedly so, I think.Saturday at 7:51pm · LikeUnlike. not to be rude, but I have no idea what you're talking about,...just having fun on facebook yo. I don't care what it says in any silly religious book. seriously,.............for comedic use only.Saturday at 8:14pm · LikeUnlike · 1. I presumed that you were just joking, but I just wanted to be sure. I was actually refering to when Moses ordered the killing of all Midianites, except for virgin women, who were to be used as sex slaves. I don't suppose that all that many Christians are aware of such scripture passages though.Saturday at 8:22pm · LikeUnlike · 2. indeed.Saturday at 8:30pm · LikeUnlike · 1. mike is my sarcastic friend jason. Or i would be going offSaturday at 8:30pm · UnlikeLike · 1. Seriously! I have some Muslim friends...I can't believe how some people react in public.Saturday at 10:00pm via mobile · LikeUnlike · 1.That pretty much makes me a fucking idiot then !Yesterday at 12:10am via mobile · LikeUnlike. he's NOT the only guy I'm talking to Jeff! I'm venting on this girls reaction!! & emphasize talking!!!!Yesterday at 12:14am · LikeUnlike · 1. I AM single & your wisdom is neededYesterday at 12:15am · LikeUnlike · 1. You are not an idiot! I value your input & don't worry,dude just showed himself in the last 3hrs. anyways...I'm single & I was talking to this guy before you gave me advice. I just hated this girls reaction to when I said he & I had a lunch date..I don't like discrimination in any form & the words she spewed made me rethink her & I's relationshipYesterday at 12:28am · LikeUnlike · 1. Just the facts ma'am... There are many Gods, but only ONE. Most High (who has ONE name).... Allah, is NOT his name, nor is he the Most High. Allah means God in Arabic (hes the God of the Arabs.....the Most High is the God of Abraham, Issach... & Jacob/Israel ... And NO OTHER NATION...... ALL other nations have thier OWN God.... i.e. Moab=Chineese/Buddah.....Elam=E. Indians/Krishna etc. .... You my dear, are an Israelite.... Now, go read the first commandment of the Most High.... NOW it should be obvious WHY it's the first...... See MoreYesterday at 1:35am via mobile · LikeUnlike · 1. Common misconception about Buddhism...Buddha is not 'our God.' There is no God in Buddhism, as it's not a religion per se. There are many Christian Buddhists, Catholic Buddhists, Atheist Buddhists, etc.Yesterday at 12:55pm via mobile · UnlikeLike · 1. Misconception ? .. Not so... Tell me please, the NAME or OUR God....Yesterday at 1:05pm via mobile · LikeUnlike. Zech 14:9 And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, AND HIS NAME ONE.Yesterday at 1:25pm · LikeUnlike · 1. Proverbs 30:4 Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou canst tell?Yesterday at 1:29pm · LikeUnlike.SURELY you know THE NAME of "OUR God"...... here's a hint:... its a HEBREW name.... the is NO letter J in the Hebrew alphabet..... good luck ! LOL !Yesterday at 1:31pm · LikeUnlike.Jrffrey Logan For Drea... why I posted my first comment... (the Most High wants Israel to STAY WITH Israel) ..... Deuteronomy 7:3 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.Yesterday at 1:44pm · LikeUnlike · 1.and here's WHY ! .... Deuteronomy 7:6 For you are a holy people unto the LORD your God: the LORD your God has chosen you to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth. ...... "All m...en are created equal"? ... NOT !! (we Israelites were in SLAVERY when that was written... 3 fifths of a man ! )..... shall I go on .... or stop here ? .....Think I'll let the scoffers seal thier fate.......Scoff on !See MoreYesterday at 1:49pm · LikeUnlike. Ok, . I will respond to this, as you've not only defamed the faith of the man in question, whom besides being Muslim is likely black, but also me as well, who is white. See, I'm a deist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism, and a...s such I believe that God encompasses the God of Abrahamic faiths, including Islam, but also transcends them. For He is not only the God of scripture, but is also the God of nature, mentioned in the "Declaration of Independence". Why there happen to be self professed Christan Deists too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Deist And I don't see why there couldn't just as well be Muslim Deists. In fact I like to refer to myself as being a Hanafian, as Hanafia is Arabic word for Deism. And eventhough most people seem to think that deism is a religion for old dead white men, we are still around in some degree. And if blacks, and/or other peoples wish to accept the deist faith, they're most welcome to. But our founding fathers, many of whom were deists, recognised the inherent right of all people to adhere to whatever religion they deem fit. And, for what it's worth, Thomas Jefferson owned a copy of the Quran. The very same Quran which Rep. Keith Ellison used in his swearing in photo. I suppose that when a white person is asked if he believes in God, and answers in the affirmative, it is assumed that he is a Christian. While if a black person is asked the same question, and says yes, people might wonder if he's a Muslim. But I say that Islam is not just for peoples of color, such as but not limited to those of African descent, but for all nations. Just as Christianity is not just for Caucasians. For the Divine Creator is Lord of all creation, black, and white alike, and desires that all people, from all cultures, and traditions, come to know Him, and follow his Law of Nature. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_nature_(precept) Which is refered to as the inner law in Romans 2:14-15 P.S. I certainly support the idea of interfaith romance, as a general principle. Namely because it's so relatively difficult for a deist, especially a man, to find other deists to court. Which was why the deist founding fathers married conventionally Christian wives.See MoreYesterday at 2:20pm · LikeUnlike.Jrffrey Logan I have a Class (Bible) right now, then will I go into the street and do "the Work"..... I will address your comment point by point (w/scripture) with the WORD of the one and only TRUE GOD... and cut through ALL LIES and FALSEHOOD, when I am... finished (w/the Work). But I'll say this now... This is NOT about religion, NOR is it about black or white ( my skin is brown & you sir are NOT white.... That is a LIE)..... this is about your NATIONALITY according to what the MOST HIGH made you to be.... And nothing more or less ... Just the FACTS (man) Ma'am ! :). ..... Until then...See MoreYesterday at 2:46pm via mobile · LikeUnlike · 1. Many thoughts-first is that if you value your relationship with this friend who reacted negatively, consider that she "may" have your best interests at heart. I often wonder if I should be totally honest with my friends but I'm ready to take the repercussions if someone doesn't like what I say. As long as what I say comes from the heart/beliefs and is shared in love.Yesterday at 6:19pm · LikeUnlike · 1. Secondly, being a mom of young children gives us different responsibilities in dating/friendships than if we are only responsible for ourselves. Lunch with someone is different than inviting someone to share in your life and therefore your child's life.Yesterday at 6:22pm · LikeUnlike · 1.Exactly Terry!! Thanks for all the input. I appreciate it all!Yesterday at 6:32pm · LikeUnlike. I"m Baaaack !.... O.K. Jason-White (your words)... first of all I have defamed no ones faith... I'm only pointing out what the Bible CLEARLY says.....Second, we will deal with Ishmael(Arab), Abrahams first son... Romans 9:7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.22 hours ago · LikeUnlike. That( Rom 9:7) just eliminated Ishmael from being the Most High's chosen.... he skipped over Ishmael and went straight to Issach. EVERYBODY knows the Most High is the God of Abraham, ISSACH and Jacob(whose name was changed to Israel)..... NOT Abraham Ishmael and whomever.....22 hours ago · LikeUnlike.Jrffrey Logan Islam (Muslim) is a RELIGION....The Most High having chosen the Children of Israel IS NOT.... he chose one people (Nation-Race) over ALL OTHERS...and doesnt give a SPIT about ANY OTHER NATION (race) of people than the Israelites !22 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1.Jrffrey Logan ‎2 Esdras 6:54 And after these, Adam also, whom thou madest lord of all thy creatures: of him come we all, and the people also whom thou hast chosen.



6:55All this have I spoken before thee, O Lord, because thou madest the world for our sa...kes



6:56As for the other people, which also come of Adam, thou hast said that they are nothing, but be like unto spittle: and hast likened the abundance of them unto a drop that falleth from a vessel.See More

22 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1.Now will I address the He's a "Black Muslim" thing... I am almost sure he's a "Black Man", but what I'm sure he DOESNT know (& you for that matter) is that the "so-called African Americans" whose ancestry goes back to American slavery are ACTUALLY ... Israelites from the Tribe of Judah, as was the nationality (race) of the one the world ignorantly calls Jesus Christ, the original Angry Black Man.22 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1.This is what happend to THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL.... Deuteronomy 28:68 And the LORD shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.22 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1. EVERYBODY knows "Jesus" was(is) a Jew I Hebrews 7:14 For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.22 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1.Jrffrey Logan ‎.... BUT, do they know that "the Jews" are "Black".... Jeremiah 14:2 Judah mourneth, and the gates thereof languish; they are black unto the ground; and the cry of Jerusalem is gone up.22 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1.Jrffrey Logan If you care to READ the discription of "the original angry black man) ... read Rev 1:13-14... & Dan 10:5-6...... What you will find, is that instead of the portrait of a one Cesare Borgia (google it) you get an (angry) black man with white(grey)-wooly hair.22 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 2.Jrffrey Logan ‎..... so, do you understand what I'm getting at here.... I dont give a DAMN, what "religion" you choose... I give a damn if you are of THE ELECT of ISRAEL..... AGAIN the man is most likely an Israelite from the tribe of Judah (sorry Drea :...) ).... but if he chooses to be a muslim.... THATS HIS CHOICE !!! He's STILL an Israelite from the tribe of Judah, and according to the 1st commandment, the most high is gonna DEAL WITH his ass.... just like he did Malcom X....who was a Judhite who chose to serve other gods!See More

21 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1. As for ..... Our Founding Fathers LOL !! .... they were ALL Masons, and worship the demonic god Baphomet, as according to Albert Pike in his book Morals & Dogma clearly states "Doubt it Not" ... google that too !21 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1. Here's something else I bet you dont know (as you have been thoroughly deceived), All "black people are NOT the same ..... Barack Obama is an African... his Daddy is an African.... but his wife is an Israelite (albeit a wicked one).....Th...e ancient Egyptians were Africans.... but whom did they have in slavery.....uhhh ... that would be us ! The 12 tribes of the Nation of Israel... Now the heiroglyphics make it OBVIOUS that the Egyptians (@ the time of Moses) were black Africans... and thier slaves the Children of Israel (the Most Highs Chosen) were "black" as well.... otherwise how could Moses have "PASSED" for an Egyptian.... and WHY did Cecil B. Demille leave this all important scene out of his"monumental" film "The Ten Commandments" (in living color....NOT).... Exodus 4:6 And the LORD said furthermore unto him, Put now thine hand into thy bosom. And he put his hand into his bosom: and when he took it out, behold, his hand was leprous as snow.

Exodus 11:7 But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue, against man or beast: that ye may know how that the LORD doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel.See More

21 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1.The Egyptians decend from Noah's son Ham, .... while the Israelites decend from Noah's son Shem, which is where you get the term anti-semite.... (should be anti-Shemite).....21 hours ago · LikeUnlike.Jrffrey Logan Now.... Jason... I'm sure you're wondering... "well, who am I in the Bible"....LOL !!! .... Here is where it gets tricky, so pay attention & read things over again if need be ! You see, Issac (sorry for the H earlier) had TWO sons, not ...just Jacob...Jake had a twin (paternal) brother named Esau.... and remember I called you a liar when you said that you were WHITE.... well you're not white, you're ACTUALLY translucent (see thru)... and what I see when I am seeing thru your skin............. is your blood ! .... Jason, you're RED !See More

21 hours ago · LikeUnlike. Genesis 25:25 And the first came out RED, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.21 hours ago · LikeUnlike.Jrffrey Logan ‎..... now, just because you are "white" doesnt necessarily make you the decendant of Esau, but, that together with the fact that you dont believe in God....(and that Deism thing, is just a polite way of saying you dont)...leads me to believe that you sir are an EDOMITE !21 hours ago · LikeUnlike.‎...... more bad news ( Jason)..... Has an Edomite ever told you that "little white lie", that God ( the Most High) loves EVERYBODY.... Well, I know you didnt believe it cause you dont even believe in The Most High !21 hours ago · LikeUnlike.Jrffrey Logan ‎...... and here's why ...... Malachi 1:2 I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob, 3And I hated Esau.....21 hours ago · LikeUnlike.If God hated me, .... I wouldnt believe in him either !21 hours ago · LikeUnlike.Jrffrey Logan ‎...So, why did I say earlier that Andrea was an Israelite ? ......... Well, for one....... She believes in the Most High.... for two...... "she got swagger" ! (my words)....... and three, I've tried her spirit ! (she IS an Israelite ...striving for righteousness).... and my comments were for her, not you (Jason).... but I expected some DUMB-ASS to attack the word of the Most High (yeah, thats scriptural too) here ya go.. 2 Peter 2:16 But was rebuked for his iniquity: the DUMB ASS speaking with man's voice forbad the madness of the prophet.See More

20 hours ago · LikeUnlike.‎.....AND I'll have you know that Terry (above) is "white" but also an Israelite, and would most likely coroborate and agree with EVERYTHING I've posted here ! (proud of her) ...20 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1.Jrffrey Logan ‎.... knowing that you'll come back a spew some more ridiculous religion (yes deism is a religion too), I'll close with this..... Psalm 53:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniq...uity: there is none that doeth good.

....... and this..... 1 John 4:1-3 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 2Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the worldSee More

20 hours ago · LikeUnlike., you are the spirit of anti-Christ, and although I know I wasted my time on you, this was actually for the edification of others who may be reading.......... oh yeah, ALL SCOFFERS ARE WELCOME TO CONDEMN THEMSELVES !20 hours ago · LikeUnlike.Jrffrey Logan ‎....... WARNING (red letters means Jesus is speaking) Luke 10:16 He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me.20 hours ago · LikeUnlike.‎........... Cheers ! (apologies Drea for using your thread as a forum)20 hours ago · LikeUnlike.‎1. Just as I thought, you're a Black Hebrew Israelite. http://www.religioustolerance.org/bhi.htm/ At first though, before I checked your profile's photos, I was under the impression that you seemed to be an Anglo-Israelite http://en.wikipe...dia.org/wiki/British_Israelism, which I would find to be the mirror opposite. 2. As it pertains to Freemasonry, Albert Pike did not speak as an authority on Freemasonry as a whole. He only gave his own insights. But the Lucifer mentioned in his "Morals and Dogma" was a different being than what Christians commonly mean. http://www.masonicinfo.com/lucifer.htm And not all Masons are deists. Freemasons may be of any religion that affirms one God. Plus, for what it matters, I've not joined any such lodge either. And some groups within the Order, such as the Knights Templar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar_(Freemasonry) actually require that it's members be Christian. Plus there is even Prince Hall Freemasonry, which is specificly for blacks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Hall_Freemasonry 3. Lastly, I believe, from what I've read, and remember from the Bible, that God desires that all people be saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth. I Timothy 2:4 Not only blacks, or only whites, but all. And anyway, whether or not supposed Israelites are black, or white, in appearance, it does not matter anyway. Galations 3:28, Colossians 3:11, Romans 10:12 I don't know what your relationship to Andrea Iness is, or how she feels about your belief system; but I do know that not only is it untrue logicly, it's also untrue biblicly. And I furthermore assert that Andrea need not become an honorary Black Hebrew (would that be like being an honary Aryan in Nazi Germany? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honorary_Aryan) in order to be right before God. All that one must do, in my opinion, is to accept God, and His law, and repent of any transgressions. If one does this s/he will be righteous before God, and assured of Heaven. I'm sure glad that, by definition, God is benevolent, and just. Otherwise I'd contend that He'd be not a deity, but a monster/devil.See More20 hours ago · LikeUnlike.P.S. The reason why I do not think that it matters what one calls God is that as their is only one God, per my concept of the divine, He does not need a name. For instance, if I were the only man in existance, others would not need to call ...me by my personal name. They may simply refer to me as "the Man". This is what Muslims do, when they refer to God as Allah, which is a contraction of the words al ilah, which is Arabic for "the God".See More19 hours ago · LikeUnlike.what the ? well, you're right about one thing...... I am a (black) Hebrew Israelite...... just as you are a Red Hebrew Edomite.... ( and according to the scriptures Mal 1:4 God hate them)......19 hours ago · LikeUnlike. oops.... I meant to say, has righteous hatred for them (Edomites) forever ! Just the facts !19 hours ago ·  I must say to your credit, that the link you posted is prettymuch correct and I appreciated it, as I thought you would post something slanderous ! You still a Edomite tho !19 hours ago · LikeUnlike. By "our God", I was referring to your earlier comment, in which you called Buddha the 'god' of Buddhism. Like I said, that is a commen misconception about Buddhism...Buddha is not our god. People who don't understand Buddhism often state that Buddha is the god of Buddhism. He's not. I am an Atheist-Buddhist, I do not have a god. 18 hours ago via mobile · LikeUnlike · 3.WTF? Why would anyone say shit about you talking to a Muslim? Why is it any of their business? I bet they would have heart attacks if they knew you talked to me, a Pagan.18 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 3 Looks like Jrffrey would have a problem with me too. WTF is up with that bible shit?18 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1. Shannon, I said that Buddah is the God of the Moabites(Chineese)......18 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1. Buddha is not, and never was a god.17 hours ago ·
> I am an Atheist-Buddhist, I do not have a god.



I have lots of gods lol.17 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 Technically we have deities, but not a creator deity. I wish we had Thor, he's hot! Lol ;)9 hours ago via mobile · LikeUnlike...." Hopefully you all can make out where one post ends, and the others begin. :)

Armored Villain Attacks a Theator.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2012/0720/Colorado-shooting-Picture-emerges-of-chaotic-scene-suspect-James-Holmes It's being reported today, all over the news outlets, about a man in his mid twenties, whom laid siege to a movie theator, which was about to show the latest Batman movie, "The Dark Knight Rises". Now even before this senseless tragedy, I was planning on reporting on the controversy surrounding this film, mainly from the left, but also somewhat from the right. Here's what I posted on my Facebook about it.

"Now here's a twist. Just this afternoon, by chance, as I was in the barn, after returning from walking my dog, I heard Rush Limbaugh saying how he thinks that the new Batman movie might be used as proganda against the Romney campaign.http:/.../www.businessinsider.com/rush-limbaughs-bane-bain-capital-clarification-batman-romney-2012-7 Being that the villain's name is Bane, which is also similar to the name of the company Mitt Romney once helped run. But, as Bane the villain is a steroid fueled muscleman, unless people want to assert the idea that Bain Capital is an example of capitalism on steroids, I'm not seeing it. Anyway, I think that any true comic book fan should know that it's Green Arrow who's the left-wing superhero, not so much Batman, whom in my opinion is not all that political at all. P.S. If you're wondering what I was doing having Rush Limbaugh's program on in the barn, my family uses such talk radio to try to scare away raccoons from potentionally geting at our Rhode Island Red chickens."                                                       I'm relieved that the authorities were able to apprehend the culprit, and take him alive, so that he will be made to account for his actions. I have found that when a perpretrator is killed in the process of commiting a violent crime, the public will want answers, and will tend to play the blame game. Coincidently, I was aquainted on-line with another killer in Colorado. A young man named, Matthew J. Murray, aka "The Nightmare Child".   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Colorado_YWAM_and_New_Life_shootings So I know a bit first hand what it's like to know someone whom end ups doing something like this. And no matter what factors might contribute to the situation, the only one who's ultimately to blame is the person whom did the deed. Not Christians, and not anti-christians. Not even music, movies, and/or other media. Though I suppose that it goes without saying that Colorado is known as an evangelical mecca. Sort of like what Utah is to Mormons. So it's statisticly likely I think that many of the slain were Christians, even without him deliberately targeting them as such. The only other point I have to make is that I feel that even in a free society, such armaments should not be made readily available to the general public. I think that military grade equipment should be stored in an armory, for use by a people's militia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Militia, and that civillian firearms should be registered, and the owners liscenced, just like with automobiles. it's just common sense precautions, in my view.

My Sisters Negative Observation of Working Conditions, at an Assisted Care Facility

This past week, my sister had a job interview at a nursing home, for a kitchen staff job. But she soon got the impression that it wasn't worthwhile, and now has had second thoughts. Here's what she posted on her facebook newsfeed.

" I was trying to get work at Briar Hill Nursing Home in the kitchen,but the more I think about it the worse I feel about it.The head cook is interested in hiring me,even had me do the required drug test.The thing is she told me outright that she is hard to work for.Even while she was showing me around the nursing home,she asked me to wait by a table in the lobby while she reprimanded one of her employees.I didn't see anything the girl was doing wrong.Then I put on the application 7-7 I could possibly work.She told me I would have to work 6:30am-8:00pm.The nursing home is 30-45 minutes away.My life would be sleeping and working.I also have to be willing to work Sundays,which a Sunday once a month might not be too bad,but I sorta have a feeling it'd be more than once a month.I also think I'd have to work every Saturday.When will I have time to help my mom? She needs me.Yes,I need to earn money,but I'm going to have to find a job that works with my responsibilities here at home and more importantly with my relationship with God.Tonight I was literally in tears.The pay would be $8 an hour and every third weekend double pay an hour.We need the money,but to kiss any life away,possibly ruin my relationship with God,and neglect my family and their needs.No amount of money can make up for those losses."   I feel that the way such staff are treated constitutes hyperexploitation. The workers are degraded into what one might call wage slavery. And then, what if a person, such as potentionally my sister, were to end up getting fired, for whatever reason? Here in Ohio, an employer has the legal right to fire an employee for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all, as we are an "employ at will" state. And if she were to get dismissed, it would adversly impact her resume, as potentional employers tend to side with other employers, when it comes to disatisfaction with employee performance. So I feel that if would be food service industry workers are looking for a job, they should seek it at a fast food restaurant. Preferably Subway, as it's more personal, and democratic, when it comes to management system. You don't run into an assemblyline meal production. It's a shame though that those whom devote at least a part of their lifetime helping those whom need special assistance, are treated so despicably. I think that it would be good if such workers were to form a union, and if necessary , go on strike.                                                                              

Noam Chomsky Endorses Stein for President

http://www.jillstein.org/chomsky Self proclaimed libertarian socialist, Noam Chomsky, recently gave his blessing to Green Party candidate, Jill Stine's campaign for the presidency of the U.S.A. Now I know that a number of anarchists/left-libertarians do not believe in voting, as a matter a general principle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Issues_in_anarchism#Participation_in_statist_democracy However, I happen to feel that an anarchist can not simply disregard the government, the way that an atheist disregards God. Whether we all like it or not, for better or worse, the government does exist, and therefore is a practical reality, in our lives. I also feel that the Green Party, with it's Ten Key Values, comes close to putting into action left-libertarian principles, in regards to the social system. And I also believe that it is right to take part in elections. At least as long as there are vital issues of justice at stake. Voting is, in my personal opinion, an act of political activism, alongside other actions, such as demonstrations. So I feel that for as long as there is to be a state, we should strive to make the best of it.

Police Hassle Bystanders

I can actually relate to this somewhat. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/opinion/the-scars-of-stop-and-frisk.html The police might act like high and mighty bullies, rather than like the public servants they're supposed to be. As anyone who's read my Facebook profile notes knows, I myself was at least once harrassed by a deputy sheriff. And this one other time, this one other deputy, with a German... Shepard police dog, drove by, and I got stopped and questioned a bit. I think because, as the car passed me, the dog barked at me. I really don't know why police conduct such field interrogations. I mean if I had been up to no good, do they seriously think that I'm going to fess up, just because they ask? The only point I have to add to this article, and video, is that I think that police sometimes also pick on white young people too, just for good measure. So that they can honestly say that they are equal opportunity hasslers.

Five Self Professed Anarchists Plotted to Blow Up Cleveland Bridge

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-120501cleveland-bridge-bomb-plot,0,4697057.story I really wish that I could just ignore this story, since as a philosophical anarchist myself I find it to be personally embarrassing. However, being that it's a major news story, plus the fact that I happen to live in the surrounding region in Ohio, I feel obligated to comment. Let me begin by saying that if there had existed a revolutionary situation, which clearly there was not, I would have found it to be a valid strategic tactic of guerilla warfare. Most, notably, during the U.S. Civil War, soldiers would blow up railroad lines, and cut telegraph lines, in order to disrupt both transportation, and communication. However, the Occupy Wallstreet Movement is commited to using peaceful methods in furthering a just, and equitable, society. I feel that we should all go along with this approach. There is not widespread popular support for a violent revolution, and I also do not feel that we've reached a critical situation yet. Now if perverbially speaking, there were a repressive regime which violently suppressed the non-violent actions of dissident activists, thereby making a violent solution necessary http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/24966.html , I would regard it as being right to revolt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_revolution But I do not believe that such an aggressive "propoganda of the deed" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propoganda_of_the_deed inspires the people to rise up against the powers that be. If anything I feel that it acts to discredit anarchism in people's minds, and casts suspicion upon other anarchists by extension. Because the public will tend to hold us all as being guilty by association. Lastly, I find that another lesson which can be learned from this is that if people try to promote insurrectionary violence, we should have nothing to do with them. Not only might we be possibly be charged as accomplices, in providing some sort of support to terrorism, but also it would be likely that the persons in question would turn out to be agents provacteurs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur But lest anyone become disenchanted with the anarchist movement, know that all causes have potential fanatics. This however does not make the ideas itself extreme. For example, in regards to abolitionism, John Brown was a fanatical militant. But most people would consider his cause to have been worthwhile, even if they feel that his methods were not praiseworthy. P.S. If social revolution were to finally come, it will not be broadcasted. Seriously, if anarchists, and/or other revolutionary socialists were to try to depose the established government at the time, I would then put my blog on a hiatus, for an indefinate amount of time. I mean it would still be kept up, but just not updated. And also, whether or not i were to decide to join in the rebellion, I would still go underground, as I expect I would be a person of interest to the powers that be. That's just a sensible given.

Woman With Tourette Syndrome Takes On Superhero Persona to Battle Intolerance

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323474 I just read about this one woman, Jess Thom, whom experienced inhospitality when she was trying to use the public rail system. First of all I'll comment by stating that one thing which British people, such as herself have, which we Americans oftentimes don't is public transportation. It can be challenging for anyone, with or without a recognised disability, to meet the possible requirements for being issued a driver's liscence, in some states. But besides lack of transportation, another barrier, for those of us with Tourette's Syndrome, is that a number of our tics might be considered to be socially inappropiate, namely coprolalia. But ultimately, I feel that we touretters should be granted the liberty to live, and function, in mainstream society. Plus be enabled to earn livelihood, in order to support ourselves to the best of our abilities, and aptitude. So hopefully "TourettesHero" will be able to raise awareness, and acceptance, of Tourette's Syndrome. I will warn you though. Ms. Thom does happen to have as a symptom coprolalia. So keep that in mind before you decide to start the video. But, by the way, according to the beliefs of Calvinists, God predestines all things, in order to bring Himself glory. So since her outbursts aren't a willful act on her part, it must be an act of sovereign grace, on God's. ;) I sure do hope that the God of the Reformed faith is glorified by her repeatedly uttering such words as biscuit, and f**k, and the phrase "happy Christmas." lol

Trayvon Martin Was Killed by a Prejudiced Vigilante

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/21/1076315/-Million-Hoodies-March-on-March-21st-http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/20/trayvon-martin-final-moments_n_1366697.html The past week or two, a young seventeen year old man, Trayvon Martin, was slain in an altercation, involving a neighborhood watch leader, who was armed with a semi-automatic handgun. The man, George Zimmerman, had thought that Trayvon seemed suspicious. Now I have at oftentimes thought that neighborhood watches tend to be made up of rumormongering busybodies. But I feel that in this case, it was more than just mere suspicion which motivated Mr. Zimmerman to confront the other man. I feel that probally the incident was not only in response to Trayvan's race, but also his youth, and clothing. I am under the impression that young adults, and teens, especially persons of color, tend to be viewed as bhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangsta_rapeing potential gang members, by older adults, namely white persons. Plus in addition, Trayvon Martin happened to have been wearing a hoodie. Now I find hoodies to be like a modern day version cowls. A cowl is like a male version of a whimple, and a whimple is like a type of hijab. Only head coverings such as these are a the most sunnah, rather than fard, by religious standards. But for whatever stereotype based reasons, hoodies are regarded as being gangwear in some places. I suppose because it might be commonly associated with the hip hop/chav subcultures http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hip_hop_fashion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chav , and therefore regarded by certain figures, namely school authorities as being gangsta looking. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangsta_rap But I feel that people should be estemed not simply by how they look, but by there conduct. People should be enabled to enjoy a general freedom of fashion, and not be condemned based upon arbitrary dresscodes. In response to this aspect of this incident, there is to be a "million hoodie march". http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/21/1076315/-Million-Hoodies-March-on-March-21st-- I myself own a number of hoodies. And if I were to be able to be in the area, I would plan on joining this demonstration. Oh, and by the way, for what it matters, my race is a mixture of white Caucasion, and Anglo-Metis. So I'm not even African-American, or Latino. Now as to Mr. Zimmerman's contention that the homicide was an act of self defense. In order for the use of any violent force to be rightly justified, deadly or not, under just war theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_war_theory , it must be in proportion to the threat presented. Trayvon Martin was unarmed. So therefore it was unwarranted to use lethal force, even if perverbially speaking he were to behave in a beligerant manner, which I do not believe he was, by the way. But then I heard that Florida, where this incident took place has some laws, which might authorise a person to kill anyone one deems to be a threat, no matter the nature of the supposed threat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law I tend to wonder if such laws might have first been enacted in the fear of an uprising by such people as slaves, and/or freedmen, in either the antebellum, or postbellum, south. I know of a case in which a man, Angelo Herndon http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-3700 , was convicted of a Reconstruction era law, intended to prevent insurrection. His conviction was later overturned however, after the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the law was excessive in nature. I sincerely hope that if need be federal supremacy http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/preemption.htm shall supersede this unjust law, which permits undue deadly force.

School Shooting Commited at Chardon High

I don't know how many are aware of this, but a school shooting took place not all that far from where I live. http://www2.nbc4i.com/news/2012/feb/28/26/school-day-ohio-brings-shootings-death-ar-947024/ Here is what the accused shooter, T.J. Lane posted on his Facebook page, some days before he alledgedly commited the act. http://www.thedailybeast.com/content/dailybeast/articles/2012/02/27/facebook-post-by-chardon-ohio-high-school-shooting-suspect-t-j-lane.html I just have two comments to make. 1. This is not the proper, prudent, way to engage in class warfare. I understand, and agree with, the opposition to the social system of classes/cliques, violence is not the most positive, or even effective way to combat it. This, for instance non-violent resistance, such as direct action. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_action#Nonviolent_direct_action http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_resistance I do not agree with the notion of aggressive"propoganda of the deed", in order to try to advance social change. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_of_the_deed 2. I express my condolences to the family, and friends, of the slain. R.I.P.